Marjorie Barretto took aggressive legal measures to protect her privacy and identity the perpetrators: Marjorie Barretto Photo Scandal 73l - Facebook
In the ever-churning world of Philippine showbiz, a single image can eclipse a thousand interviews. Recently, the search query has been gaining traction among fans, archivists, and pop culture enthusiasts. But what is it about this specific code—this “73l”—that bridges the gap between a static photograph and the dynamic narrative of one of the country’s most fascinating entertainment dynasties? Marjorie Barretto Photo Scandal 73l
Marjorie initially denied that the photos were of her. However, after they went viral, she and her legal team, led by Atty. Lorna Kapunan , confirmed their authenticity. Marjorie Barretto took aggressive legal measures to protect
Barretto filed a complaint with the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI) Cybercrime Division to identify the source of the leak. Her lawyers issued demand letters to bloggers and websites, citing violations of Republic Act No. 9995 (the Anti-Photo and Video Voyeurism Act of 2009). Legal Significance Marjorie initially denied that the photos were of her
You cannot discuss Marjorie Barretto without the “Entertainment” half of the keyword. She is a member of the , often called the “Kennedys of Philippine Showbiz.”
: Attorney Lorna Kapunan noted that this was the first significant case filed under the Anti-Photo and Video Voyeurism Act